digiscott
March 2nd, 2005, 04:07 PM
only twice
wallpaper lack curly long hair styles
redindian
07-24 08:00 PM
put a poll - then it makes sense... 2years
martinvisalaw
02-23 06:01 PM
I assume that your girlfriend is a US citizen. See here for the permanent residence (PR) procedure: Family-based Marriage Immigration categories - Elaine Martin Attorney (http://martinvisalaw.com/family_lpr.html). Getting married or starting the PR process should not affect your company's L-1 extension petition.
2011 Solange Knowle#39;s curly
fide_champ
02-23 08:25 AM
Guys:
Do you know, how one could apply for a Visitor Visa without a Sponsorer in the US ?
What documents do they need to furnish ?
As I understand there are a lot of ppl who come to the US who do not have kids/relatives here, what do they have to show if they are just coming to the US for a Visit not work related ?
Thanks
Make sure that they show enough funds to survive and not become a liability.
Do you know, how one could apply for a Visitor Visa without a Sponsorer in the US ?
What documents do they need to furnish ?
As I understand there are a lot of ppl who come to the US who do not have kids/relatives here, what do they have to show if they are just coming to the US for a Visit not work related ?
Thanks
Make sure that they show enough funds to survive and not become a liability.
more...
chanduy9
07-05 08:50 AM
send flowers...it is much more than rally...
Blog Feeds
05-27 12:40 PM
As everybody knows by now, recently Arizona's Governor signed a law requiring local law enforcement officials to take into custody persons when they have a "reasonable suspicion" that they are present in the U.S. illegally. The person would be turned over to the Immigration Service, and be released from jail if they could demonstrate their legal status. Last Monday, the ACLU and various other groups sued Arizona officials in Federal Court to void the law on a number of grounds including violation of the Constitutional rights of equal protection of the law and free speech. President Obama has questioned the...
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/carlshusterman/2010/05/liberty-and-justice-for-all.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/carlshusterman/2010/05/liberty-and-justice-for-all.html)
more...
Becks
01-18 08:23 PM
You need to get a copy of 140, so you may have to tell your employer about your AC21 (actually no need if you have a copy of approved 140). Nothing to get scared of. But its good to leave in good terms.
Once you start using EAD your H1 will get cancelled anyway. So it wont make any difference if your old employer cancels it.
Good Luck!
Once you start using EAD your H1 will get cancelled anyway. So it wont make any difference if your old employer cancels it.
Good Luck!
2010 Hairstyles for lack women
divakarr
07-26 10:10 AM
she ate her word and did not support skill bill, how about we send flower to her.
more...
Kowsik9002
04-18 04:17 PM
My cousin is a GC holder and plans to bring wife, who is indian citizen here to U.S., please tell me how long it will take, what applications to apply for and such. Thanks you.
Kowsik
Kowsik
hair lack curly hairstyle keri
bayarea07
05-24 08:01 PM
Hello All,
I am on H1 Right now and through the same employer i filed my GC in May 2007 (I-140 approved in Oct' 2007)
but I have got an offer from another company who is willing to transfer my H1, so wanted to know what is the best options.
- Should i Switch on H1 and if yes, can i start working for them before the H1 Transfer process is complete
- If I did decide to go on H1 then do i need to file some documents for my I-485 and EAD Renewal as well (meaning do i have to inform USCIS about my change in employer for GC application)
Thanks!
I am on H1 Right now and through the same employer i filed my GC in May 2007 (I-140 approved in Oct' 2007)
but I have got an offer from another company who is willing to transfer my H1, so wanted to know what is the best options.
- Should i Switch on H1 and if yes, can i start working for them before the H1 Transfer process is complete
- If I did decide to go on H1 then do i need to file some documents for my I-485 and EAD Renewal as well (meaning do i have to inform USCIS about my change in employer for GC application)
Thanks!
more...
enigma006
11-30 11:07 AM
Hai..
F1 to H1..
My H1 is still pending..RFE on Oct 1st and employer replied..but staus is still same saying RFE sent..case on hold..
can I go for OPT Extension now as my current OPT dint end yet??
Do I need to work in this current OPT to be qualified for OPT Extension or is it sufficient if I have an offer from my employer and he is E-verified??
Looks like some of you got approval for OPT extension..so please help me by posting how you applied..
Let me know of legal stay during these times..
Please help me..
thanks...
F1 to H1..
My H1 is still pending..RFE on Oct 1st and employer replied..but staus is still same saying RFE sent..case on hold..
can I go for OPT Extension now as my current OPT dint end yet??
Do I need to work in this current OPT to be qualified for OPT Extension or is it sufficient if I have an offer from my employer and he is E-verified??
Looks like some of you got approval for OPT extension..so please help me by posting how you applied..
Let me know of legal stay during these times..
Please help me..
thanks...
hot girlfriend Wavy Curled Hair
days_go_by
08-12 12:23 PM
c'mon guys is this soooooo difficult to answer ? experts ??
------------
I think if you are out of the country for 1 year u can get 3 yr extension. But you would get counted in the quota though,fresh H1, I think.
------------
I think if you are out of the country for 1 year u can get 3 yr extension. But you would get counted in the quota though,fresh H1, I think.
more...
house Alicia Keys natural hair
amitr2k
09-19 03:42 AM
Hi, i would like to know the fees to get the L1-B transferred to L1-A.
Thanks.
Thanks.
tattoo short curly hair styles
KKumarGC
07-27 04:03 PM
Hello Everyone,
My dates are current last month. I added my wife couple weeks back [I couldnt add her earlier as i was not married then]. I got her receipt notices and also fingerprinting. My question is :
is there a way to say that she is linked to my application ?
becuase when I call USCIS, they say: This is separate application and they cant say if it is linked to primary or not.
--> Does receiving receipt notices mean that they accepted her application and linked to primary ?
--> does Fingerprinting appointment means that they accepted her application.
My concern is if my GC is approved and if she is not linked, it would be a problem,I guess.
So, please advise me as to how would i know if she is linked to my application?
please advise
kumar
My dates are current last month. I added my wife couple weeks back [I couldnt add her earlier as i was not married then]. I got her receipt notices and also fingerprinting. My question is :
is there a way to say that she is linked to my application ?
becuase when I call USCIS, they say: This is separate application and they cant say if it is linked to primary or not.
--> Does receiving receipt notices mean that they accepted her application and linked to primary ?
--> does Fingerprinting appointment means that they accepted her application.
My concern is if my GC is approved and if she is not linked, it would be a problem,I guess.
So, please advise me as to how would i know if she is linked to my application?
please advise
kumar
more...
pictures lack curly hairstyles
ras
08-19 01:52 PM
I remember some time back having seen a link where you could get the list of labors/I-140 for a particular employer. I am not sure if it is in http://www.flcdatacenter.com/ . Can some one point to the correct link where you could get the list of H1 or Labor or I-140s approved for an employer based on the company name?
dresses Black Hair Hairstyles 2
PD200711
01-22 03:43 PM
Case type: H-1 approval without end-client letter
Submitted by Rajiv S. Khanna on Jan 20th 2010, Modified on Jan 20th 2010
Category: H-1 Visa
Status: H-1B approved
We have just received another H-1 approval for an end-client placement. There were two intervening vendors and the end-client declined to provide a letter stating that there is no requirement in law for them to provide any such letter. We had to get together convincing secondary evidence. I was highly doubtful we will get the approval, but we did. So, despite the January 8 memo from USCIS, there is life yet for consulting industry.
Immigration.com Sample Cases | Immigration.Com - Law Offices of Rajiv S. Khanna, PC (http://www.immigration.com/sample-cases)
/h-1-visa/another-h-1-approval-without-end-client-letter
Submitted by Rajiv S. Khanna on Jan 20th 2010, Modified on Jan 20th 2010
Category: H-1 Visa
Status: H-1B approved
We have just received another H-1 approval for an end-client placement. There were two intervening vendors and the end-client declined to provide a letter stating that there is no requirement in law for them to provide any such letter. We had to get together convincing secondary evidence. I was highly doubtful we will get the approval, but we did. So, despite the January 8 memo from USCIS, there is life yet for consulting industry.
Immigration.com Sample Cases | Immigration.Com - Law Offices of Rajiv S. Khanna, PC (http://www.immigration.com/sample-cases)
/h-1-visa/another-h-1-approval-without-end-client-letter
more...
makeup lack-hair-weave-styles
arjunram
03-27 10:54 PM
My Receipt date for 485 is july 27th 2007 and nebraska is processing applications for this date.
I applied for cross chargeability on 10th March.. Any idea how long before my case is approved? My lawyer has confirmed that its possible and he claims that it should take 4-8 weeks. I wanted to check to see what the experience of people has been so far?
Any insight is greatly appreciated! Thanks!
I applied for cross chargeability on 10th March.. Any idea how long before my case is approved? My lawyer has confirmed that its possible and he claims that it should take 4-8 weeks. I wanted to check to see what the experience of people has been so far?
Any insight is greatly appreciated! Thanks!
girlfriend Hairstyle: Curly that falls
Macaca
04-27 09:43 AM
Sen. Luddite Strikes Again (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/04/26/AR2007042602257.html) -- Once more, a mystery Republican blocks electronic filing for Senate candidates, Friday, April 27, 2007
JUST AS she did on April 17, Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) went to the Senate floor to call for unanimous consent on a common-sense bill that would require candidates to file their campaign finance reports electronically. And just as he or she did on April 17, Sen. Ima Luddite (R-Who Knows Where) voiced opposition. This time the mouthpiece was Sen. Jim Bunning (R-Ky.). "On behalf of the Republican side," he said, "I object." We object to the obstruction.
Honestly, what is the big deal here? Filing campaign finance reports electronically has been standard operating procedure for candidates for the House of Representatives and the White House for years -- as it has been for political parties, political action committees and "527" groups. Yet Senate candidates are still trudging down to the Senate Office of Public Records with paper copies of their reports, which are then passed along to the Federal Election Commission, which sends them to a vendor that punches in the information and zaps it back to the FEC electronically. That finally makes them widely available, sometimes too late for voters to see who's donating to whom and how the money is being spent. With this seeming fear of modernity, it's a wonder the Senate isn't calculating budgets with an abacus. Or is it a fear of disclosure?
After the bill was blocked, Ms. Feinstein, chairman of the Senate Rules and Administration Committee, said, "It is very hard for me to understand who could oppose this and what their reason for opposing it could be." It is very hard for us, too. Sen. Luddite -- whoever he or she may be -- should come out of the shadows and explain the irrational fear that is keeping the Senate from joining the rest of us in the 21st century. Senator anonymous -- Another Day, Another Hold On Finance Bill (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/04/26/AR2007042602249.html) By Matthew Mosk (http://projects.washingtonpost.com/staff/email/matthew+mosk/), Washington Post Staff Writer, Friday, April 27, 2007
Sen. Anonymous struck again yesterday.
The infamous unnamed senator (or senators) has for more than a week blocked passage of legislation that would require Senate candidates to file campaign finance reports electronically.
Electronic filings would make the names of campaign donors readily available -- it's how members of the House and presidential candidates have been doing it for years. When Sen. Russell Feingold (D-Wis.) first brought the bill to the floor last week, though, he was told that an unnamed lawmaker objected.
Long-standing Senate custom allows the objection of a single senator to stop a bill in its tracks -- it's known as a secret hold. A measure that passed the Senate earlier this year, and awaits a House vote, would eliminate the practice.
The hold unleashed a torrent of activity on the Internet, as bloggers tried to flush out the identity of the senator responsible for the hold. But after an onslaught of phone calls to Senate offices, the bloggers have no answer. No one owned up to being the culprit.
Yesterday, the bill's sponsor tried again. And again, the Republican floor leader objected. A spokesman for Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) said he is sure the name of the secret senator is known "in the cloakroom," but he said that misses the point.
"A hold can't stop something from coming to the floor," Don Stewart said. "It can only stop it from being pushed through without a full and open debate on the bill."
That's true -- sponsors had been trying to pass the bill by unanimous consent, which does not permit amendment or debate. But Feingold told the liberal blog Daily Kos that the path was typical for a bill with 35 bipartisan co-sponsors that did not elicit a single objection in committee.
Writing on the blog yesterday, Feingold said: "The fact is that someone anonymously blocked the bill, . . . that person has made no effort to resolve his or her concerns with us, and the Republican leadership won't even tell us who that person is."
JUST AS she did on April 17, Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) went to the Senate floor to call for unanimous consent on a common-sense bill that would require candidates to file their campaign finance reports electronically. And just as he or she did on April 17, Sen. Ima Luddite (R-Who Knows Where) voiced opposition. This time the mouthpiece was Sen. Jim Bunning (R-Ky.). "On behalf of the Republican side," he said, "I object." We object to the obstruction.
Honestly, what is the big deal here? Filing campaign finance reports electronically has been standard operating procedure for candidates for the House of Representatives and the White House for years -- as it has been for political parties, political action committees and "527" groups. Yet Senate candidates are still trudging down to the Senate Office of Public Records with paper copies of their reports, which are then passed along to the Federal Election Commission, which sends them to a vendor that punches in the information and zaps it back to the FEC electronically. That finally makes them widely available, sometimes too late for voters to see who's donating to whom and how the money is being spent. With this seeming fear of modernity, it's a wonder the Senate isn't calculating budgets with an abacus. Or is it a fear of disclosure?
After the bill was blocked, Ms. Feinstein, chairman of the Senate Rules and Administration Committee, said, "It is very hard for me to understand who could oppose this and what their reason for opposing it could be." It is very hard for us, too. Sen. Luddite -- whoever he or she may be -- should come out of the shadows and explain the irrational fear that is keeping the Senate from joining the rest of us in the 21st century. Senator anonymous -- Another Day, Another Hold On Finance Bill (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/04/26/AR2007042602249.html) By Matthew Mosk (http://projects.washingtonpost.com/staff/email/matthew+mosk/), Washington Post Staff Writer, Friday, April 27, 2007
Sen. Anonymous struck again yesterday.
The infamous unnamed senator (or senators) has for more than a week blocked passage of legislation that would require Senate candidates to file campaign finance reports electronically.
Electronic filings would make the names of campaign donors readily available -- it's how members of the House and presidential candidates have been doing it for years. When Sen. Russell Feingold (D-Wis.) first brought the bill to the floor last week, though, he was told that an unnamed lawmaker objected.
Long-standing Senate custom allows the objection of a single senator to stop a bill in its tracks -- it's known as a secret hold. A measure that passed the Senate earlier this year, and awaits a House vote, would eliminate the practice.
The hold unleashed a torrent of activity on the Internet, as bloggers tried to flush out the identity of the senator responsible for the hold. But after an onslaught of phone calls to Senate offices, the bloggers have no answer. No one owned up to being the culprit.
Yesterday, the bill's sponsor tried again. And again, the Republican floor leader objected. A spokesman for Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) said he is sure the name of the secret senator is known "in the cloakroom," but he said that misses the point.
"A hold can't stop something from coming to the floor," Don Stewart said. "It can only stop it from being pushed through without a full and open debate on the bill."
That's true -- sponsors had been trying to pass the bill by unanimous consent, which does not permit amendment or debate. But Feingold told the liberal blog Daily Kos that the path was typical for a bill with 35 bipartisan co-sponsors that did not elicit a single objection in committee.
Writing on the blog yesterday, Feingold said: "The fact is that someone anonymously blocked the bill, . . . that person has made no effort to resolve his or her concerns with us, and the Republican leadership won't even tell us who that person is."
hairstyles Afro Hair styles
alex77
09-01 07:59 PM
No change at TSC. NSC moved by 2 days.
http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.5af9bb95919f35e66f614176543f6d1a/?vgnextoid=21f2d9bbf0cb4110VgnVCM1000004718190aRCR D
http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.5af9bb95919f35e66f614176543f6d1a/?vgnextoid=21f2d9bbf0cb4110VgnVCM1000004718190aRCR D
GCVictim
02-18 02:37 PM
Hi,
My friend has approved H1B with his previous employer and visa was stamped in 2006 in India. Visa is valid till end of 2009. He never came to US and he does not work for the employer(like Wipro) anymore in India.
Now he wants to come to US with new employer. What are the choices? As I know to transfer H1B to new employer he should be in US and with other documents like paystubs, SSN, etc.
I appreciate your response.
Thanks,
My friend has approved H1B with his previous employer and visa was stamped in 2006 in India. Visa is valid till end of 2009. He never came to US and he does not work for the employer(like Wipro) anymore in India.
Now he wants to come to US with new employer. What are the choices? As I know to transfer H1B to new employer he should be in US and with other documents like paystubs, SSN, etc.
I appreciate your response.
Thanks,
life99f
04-28 02:29 AM
I mean, when she/he wants to enroll some classes in local univ?
No comments:
Post a Comment